This vacillation between assertion and denial in discussions about organized abuse can be understood as functional, in that it serves to contain the traumatic kernel at the heart of allegations of organized abuse. In his influential ‘just world’ theory, Lerner (1980) argued that emotional wellbeing is predicated on the assumption that the world is an orderly, predictable and just place in which people get what they deserve. Whilst such assumptions are objectively false, Lerner argued that individuals have considerable investment in maintaining them since they are conducive to feelings of self—efficacy and trust in others. When they encounter evidence contradicting the view that the world is just, individuals are motivated to defend this belief either by helping the victim (and thus restoring a sense of justice) or by persuading themselves that no injustice has occurred. Lerner (1980) focused on the ways in which the ‘just world’ fallacy motivates victim-blaming, but there are other defenses available to bystanders who seek to dispel troubling knowledge. Organized abuse highlights the severity of sexual violence in the lives of some children and the desire of some adults to inflict considerable, and sometimes irreversible, harm upon the powerless. Such knowledge is so toxic to common presumptions about the orderly nature of society, and the generally benevolent motivations of others, that it seems as though a defensive scaffold of disbelief, minimization and scorn has been erected to inhibit a full understanding of organized abuse. Despite these efforts, there has been a recent resurgence of interest in organized abuse and particularly ritualistic abuse (e.g. Sachs and Dalton 2008, Epstein et al. 2011, Miller 2012).

Organised Sexual Abuse